Early cycles turning?

Monday 22nd of May 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

Some sectors in the economy go through what are known as cycles. Periods of very high demand are followed by big cycles down in demand, in a cycle of boom and bust for the industry. These cycles of demand are driven by other factors, sometimes in the wider economy, sometimes driven by factors specific to that industry, like computer games consoles for example where cycles are driven by the age of consoles and the launch of new products. Many industries exhibit cyclical characteristics, from automotive manufacturing to advertising. It can be hard to avoid cycles as an investor.

If we are investing in an industry that exhibits cyclical characteristics, it is very important to understand the cycles in question and to try and ascertain where we are in that cycle.

Being at or close to the peak of the demand cycle can be a dangerous time to invest. Recent strong demand is often interpreted by the market, investors, even some management teams of companies, as indicative of the new base level of higher demand. This creates a false sense of confidence in the outlook for the business which, in reality, is on the precipice of a major cyclical downturn. Time and time again across multiple industries we see cyclical highs interpreted in an overly optimistic way.

This over optimism translates into high valuation multiples and higher share prices for the stocks in question. The peak of the demand cycle in a cyclical industry, misinterpreted as a new base level of demand for the future, combined with a gross underestimation of the likelihood of a cyclical downturn in demand, results in share prices of related companies that are too high. The risk of share price declines, as reality meets overly optimistic expectations, is high. This is a time to be avoiding investing in stocks exposed to such cycles.

The opposite is true for lows in a cycle. At cyclical lows, we often find that sentiment towards related companies is very pessimistic, often overly so. The path down to the cycle low was a tough one for investors, management teams, and researchers covering the sector, with share prices coming down heavily to reflect lower demand and weaker performance for related businesses. This also translates into lower expectations for demand and profit growth. The lows are interpreted as a new lower base level of overall demand for the industry, and the possibility of a cyclical move up in demand is underappreciated by the market. This results in share prices and valuations that are too low, the risk of a major surprise to the upside and major move up in share prices is high. This is a good time to be buying companies exposed to such cycles.

More often than not investors get these cycles the wrong way round. Time and again we see investors buying aggressively at the top of cycles and selling closer to lows. The optimal strategy when investing in cyclical industries is to do the opposite, sell at cyclical highs and buy at cyclical lows.

This begs the question, are there any cyclical sectors in the stock market today exhibiting cyclical high or cyclical lows?

We think there could be some sectors exhibiting the characteristics of cyclical lows and, as such, now could be an attractive entry point to buy into those sectors. One example is in the energy related capital goods sector. These are industrial companies that manufacture and service the heavy equipment used to produce and transmit electricity in the power grid. Last year was a very tough year for these companies, with high input cost inflation crushing profit margins and economic and political uncertainty delaying orders for new equipment. Share prices of related companies and valuations came down significantly. In some cases related companies traded on their lowest valuations in their trading history late last year. The market was valuing these companies as though the lows in profit margins and demand were the new normal.

The truth is far different, we may in fact be on the cusp of a major up-cycle in demand for energy related capital equipment. The world is in dire need of more energy supply, from renewables and other lower carbon sources to fight climate change, and to supply rising demand for energy in emerging markets.

This looks to us like a classic bottom of the cycle opportunity and we have already seen recent earnings reports from these companies surprise to the upside, with orders, revenues, and profit margins well ahead of estimates as cost inflation has eased and demand has improved, all resulting in strong moves up in share prices over the past 4-5 months.

In the coming weeks, we’ll be giving some more examples of sectors where we see cyclical highs or lows, where investors should be considering reducing or increasing exposure.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Valuations

Monday 15th of May 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

Valuations, Valuations, Valuations (Let's Go!)

Dominions team recently had the pleasure of travelling to Latin America to meet with clients and partners they work with in the region. Their colleagues in Uruguay showed them the meaning of ‘asado’, while friends from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Ecuador, and many other countries were as kind and hospitable as anyone could ask for.

During their presentations and conversations, one topic came up again and again. What is the investment outlook for the rest of 2023?

Last year was a tough year for investors with equity and bond markets declining significantly. High inflation and rising interest rates in 2022 have set us up this year for the prospect of a slowing economy and even a possible recession. Recent bank failures in the United States and Europe further adds to the uncertainty facing asset allocators and individual investors.

The current situation facing investors is highly uncertain and very challenging. What’s going to happen and how do we invest?

Dominions response to this question was as follows:

We cannot, in fact nobody can, accurately predict what the global economy is going to do in 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, etc. Trying to predict the future revenues of an individual company is highly complex and even with the best analysis your prediction is most likely to be wrong. Scale up this problem of unpredictability to the whole economy, and the project becomes pointless. The starting point for any and all investors, in our view, should be to not bother trying to predict the future of the macro-economy.

This is especially important in times of great uncertainty, as we find ourselves in today in financial markets. Taking strong views either way (either bullish or bearish) poses great risks to investors. Too aggressive / optimistic a position in your portfolio risks significant losses if the economy is weaker than expected. Too bearish / pessimistic a view risks missing out on strong positive returns from risk assets if the economy is stronger than expected.

Rather than focussing our attention as investors on factors we cannot control or predict (e.g., the macro economy), we think the correct strategy for investors today is to focus on factors you can understand and which are under your control.

The current market price of an asset relative to the cash income it produces is a very useful measure of its valuation. For example, imagine a business with a market value of $100 million, with 10 million shares listed on a stock exchange. This equates to a price per share (the stock price) of $10. This same company generated $20 million of free cash flow last year, equivalent to $2 per share of free cash flow. If we divide the market value of the company by the cash profits generated by the company last year, we get what is known as a ‘valuation multiple’. In this case, the free cash flow multiple is 5x. In other words, the company is currently trading on a valuation of 5x historic cash flows.

This methodology allows us to compare investment opportunities. Imagine now another company in the same industry as our previous example. Let’s say it generated $30 million of free cash flows last year, and trades on the stock market for a total company valuation of $360 million. The free cash flow multiple for this company would be 12x.

We can now compare the two investment opportunities based on valuation. One company trades on a 5x multiple, the other a 12x. As a prospective investor, you are paying much more for the second example than the first example, the first example is ‘cheaper’ and the second is more ‘expensive’. All else equal, you should buy the first stock trading on the lower valuation multiple.

There are dozens of different valuation multiples and other methodologies we can bring to the table when making investment decisions. The importance of doing this and focussing on investments trading on attractively low valuations is that you are reducing the downside risk to your portfolio. To go back to our example, two businesses trading in the same industry, one trading on 5x its cash flow generation, the other on 12x, all else equal in a recession the more expensive stock will fall much more in % terms than the cheaper stock.

This brings us back to the initial question. What is the outlook for 2023 and how should we invest?

We do not know what the economic outcome will be, but what we can do is invest in assets trading on attractive valuation multiples. The cheaper the better, if the asset is of a good quality. If we can build a portfolio of high quality assets trading on low valuation multiples, this sets up the strategy to: (i) be a recession beater and outperform in the event of a weaker economy, and (ii) perform very well if the economy is stronger than expected, because we still own risk assets and did not hide in cash or money market funds!

Dominions advice in this difficult time is: don’t panic, get the strategy right, and invest in strategies with a focus on offering quality at an attractive price.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Growth vs. Value investing: Have your cake and eat it

Wednesday 10th of May 2023

Investment Strategies

In equity investing there are many different strategies available to investors to choose from when allocating. We can pick specific regions, like European or North American equities. We can choose between actively managed vs. passively managed strategies. We can even pick specific sectors or trends to invest in, for example, an equity fund strategy that only invests in stocks linked to renewable energy, or to artificial intelligence.

These strategy choices are usually mutually exclusive. If we decide to allocate investor capital to an emerging market equity fund, then we would expect no US stocks to be included in that strategy. Similarly, a passive fund investment, by definition, has no active human involvement in stock picking, the passive strategy only invests according to the relevant index.

Two of the most important and widely used equity strategies available to investors are: (i) growth investing, and (ii) value investing.

Growth investing is a strategy based on investing in stocks with underlying businesses that are growing at a much faster rate than the broader economy, and typically also growing faster than the average stock in a major index like S&P 500 or Euro Stoxx 600.

Value investing is a strategy focussed on buying equities trading on low valuations, typically much lower than the average of a major market index, where there is perceived to be a ‘mispricing’ by the market. When buying stocks using a value methodology, the investor is taking a view that the current market price for the stock is much lower than the real underlying value of the business.

Generally, growth and value strategies are considered mutually exclusive, like our earlier examples. In fact, the entire professional investment industry thinks this way. Major pension funds, for example, when allocating their investor capital to equities will often split their equity allocations between ‘growth’ and ‘value’ equities, just as they will split allocations between ‘European’ and ‘US’ stocks.

This entrenched way of thinking in the investment industry is interesting to us, because we think it opens up an opportunity to do things differently and offer investors something unique.

We believe that growth and value strategies are not, necessarily, mutually exclusive. It is possible for a stock to exhibit the characteristics of both!

Imagine a company that owns a powerful digital advertising business, which has seen exceptional growth over the past decade. As traditional advertising continues to migrate to the digital world, via targeted advertising, this company’s leading platform is the first choice for many marketing teams increasing spend on digital adverts. This same business, because of some short-term concerns around the economy, sees its stock sell-off by 75% in one year, during a broader market sell-off in equities. After this the stock trades on an earnings multiple (a measure of valuation) of just 8x, half the valuation of the market index average.

This example company is exhibiting the characteristics of a growth stock, given its high growth digital advertising business and the likely prospect that it continues to grow for many years to come. But it also exhibits the characteristics of a value stock, given the very low valuation it trades on relative to the market and relative to the quality of the business.

The example we gave is a real investment in two of our investment funds at Dominion, and after buying it at these depressed valuations, it has increased in price by c. +100%.

Growth and value do not, we believe, have to be thought of as mutually exclusive. Investors do not necessarily have to choose between them. It is possible to have the best of both worlds, to ‘have your cake and eat it’, and invest in companies exhibiting the desired characteristics of both growth and value strategies.

This is exactly the approach we take at Dominion to the Global Trends strategy, led by the Global Trends Managed Fund. We search for stocks offering investors the best of both worlds, companies with high quality businesses that are growing, while also trading on valuations that are especially attractive and offer significant upside.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Talk of American decline is dangerous for your investment returns

Tuesday 2nd of May 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

The situation in the US is currently hard...

Political turmoil and an increasingly divided society. Rising crime levels in major cities, life expectancies declining, higher levels of drug addiction. Ballooning levels of government debt and money printing to fund its obligations at home and abroad.

The current state of affairs in the United States is challenging to say the very least.

Dominion Capital Strategies

At the same time China continues its rise as an economic and military superpower, its influence around the world growing.

The domestic political and economic challenges facing the United States today, combined with the emergence of a major challenger in the form of China, have led many to take the view that America is going through a period of relative decline. Its position as the pre-eminent economic, political, military, and cultural superpower will be steadily eroded and replaced as its society and economy underperform a resurgent China. Some are even suggesting we could see a civil war in the United States and a collapse of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency.

Pretty worrying stuff if you own US assets in your portfolio!

We believe very strongly that not only is this idea of America’s decline premature, it is just plain wrong and, what’s more, believing it is a major risk to your investment returns.

When making portfolio allocation decisions, a belief that the United States is in terminal decline might very likely lead an investor to reduce or even completely remove exposure to (for example) US equities from their investment portfolio. If America is on the path to economic stagnation, or worse, why own US assets?

To take our thinking on this issue a step further, not only do we think this narrative of American decline is wrong, we believe that ‘peak America’, the greatest period of American innovation, dynamism, economic prowess, this is ahead of us.

Much to the chagrin of many European intellectuals (and Ray Dalio) the United States of the 2030s and 2040s, we argue, is likely to be an even more dominant force in the global economy. Rather than being replaced by the emergence of new major global powers like China, India, and eventually regions like West Africa, these new powers will compliment and reenforce America’s position in the world.

  • How can we be so confident in taking this view?
  • What basis do we have to take such a strong view about the future, when the future is so uncertain?

As long-term investors, we spend a lot of time looking deep into the future to try and assess how to position portfolios and investments, focussing as much as possible on the dynamics of long-term trends and avoiding, as much as possible, being biased by short-term news flow and volatility.

As part of our research process, we also turn our long-term gaze backwards to the past. The past is a data rich, helpful guide to understanding the present and the future.

This is a good point to introduce the concept of fragile and anti-fragile systems. Developed by the mathematician and investor Nassim Taleb, a fragile system is one which suffers greatly from small levels of change in its environment. A ceramic vase quite literally is a fragile system because it experiences catastrophic effects to its structure from a small change in environment, a child pushing it over for example. Some companies or even governments are fragile. Small changes, a political uprising for example, or a new competitor with a high-quality product, are all it takes for an entire collapse in their systems (much like the ceramic vase).

An anti-fragile system is the exact opposite. This is a system that is strengthened by stress and change. A good example is safety standards in commercial air travel. Every time there is an accident, a plane crashes or skids off the runway, the investigation leads to learnings which are used to improve the safety of all other current and future aircraft. Taking a flight today is thousands of times safer vs. taking a flight in the 1970s, precisely because that system is anti-fragile, stresses, change and volatility (in the form of aircraft crashing) re-enforced and strengthened the system, with exponentially positive outcomes for passenger safety.

Dictatorships often appear to be robust structures. Very far from fragile. If we look at China today under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party, many would laugh if you called it a ‘fragile system’. But the truth is, behind the seemingly powerful façade of macho leadership, extravagant military displays, is a fundamentally weak and fragile structure which can break very suddenly.

The track record of systems like China’s is terrible!

The 20th century is a graveyard of dictatorships and autocracies who either collapsed, were overthrown, or were defeated on the battlefield by democracies. Imperial Germany, then Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, the Soviet Union, the military Juntas of Argentina and Brazil. It’s easy to forget that Spain and Portugal were fascist dictatorships until very recently. Both have only been democracies for 40-50 years. Eastern Europe for even less time.

What’s more, and this is where we claim democracies have elements of anti-fragility, many former dictatorships, in some cases sworn enemies of democracies, are today successful democratic nations and very close allies of the United States.

It’s an incredibly powerful system that can turn former enemies into close voluntary allies! We’d like to see China under the communist party pull that one off. Vladimir Putin in Russia… yeah right.

But America has done this with two of the world’s formerly most powerful dictatorships. Japan and Germany (almost) turned the world into a global military dictatorship. America defeated both, dropping nuclear weapons on one of them, yet today Japan and Germany are two of America’s closest allies. Again, we hate to belabour the point, but we’d like to see China pull that off. We would not bet on it.

Further, after having listed just a few of the long list of failed dictatorships of the past century, how many large democracies can you name that have collapsed in the past 100 years? There are no examples.

Let’s take our thinking one step further and focus on the United States and why we think it is an anti-fragile system, a system which is strengthened by stress and volatility. In the past 200 years, the world’s most powerful and successful democracy, the United States, had a full-blown civil war, the bloodiest conflict in the country’s history. More Americans died fighting other Americans from 1861 to 1865 (the US Civil War), than died in either World War I or World War II.

Yet, within 40 years of the end of the US Civil War, the United States was a united country, had ended slavery, and had become the world’s largest economy. Within 80 years of the end of that conflict, America was the undisputed global hegemon, dominant in economy, culture, politics, and military power. This does not sound like a fragile system to us, this sounds like a system that is strengthened by stresses, even big ones like political division and war, a country with an incredible capacity for re-invention, for renewal, and for progression, especially during the tough times.

The past decade of political division, economic stress, pandemic, Trump, Biden, potentially Trump again, the rise of China, undoubtedly these are concerning and should be followed closely. But to conclude from this very short period of relative turmoil that America now faces imminent decline is, by historical standards, ridiculous.

Think of the technological marvels that have changed your life over the past 20 years… the iPhone and launch of smartphones, the internet, increasingly powerful and affordable computers. The recent launch of ChatGPT and large language models which will like change our lives very soon. These technologies are not emerging from China, let alone Russia, or India, not even from Europe (increasingly trending towards becoming an open-air museum). All (literally all) of the major technological breakthroughs of the past 20 years and even the latest ones are coming directly from America, or from closely aligned democracies (Israel, the UK, Germany). China’s covid vaccine doesn’t even work.

The United States today, despite the headwinds it faces, remains the global centre for innovation, technological development, cultural direction, and political power. The stresses it faces today will strengthen it, while (eventually) the stresses China faces will bring down its fragile system of government, just like every dictatorship before it. We’re bullish on the democratic, US-aligned China that emerges after that!

We’re highly confident underweighting US equities in portfolios (or even cutting them completely, which some investors are doing!) is a major mistake. The takeaway for investors, over the long-term, is that you must own US equities!

Underweighting US equities would have been a terrible decision over the past 100 years, especially so during past times of crisis for the United States (of which there have been many, and after which every time America came out stronger).

Long-term, we’re bullish on America, we’re bullish American stocks, and we think you should be too.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Managing a portfolio like Pep Guardiola

Monday 24th of April 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

Is there any advice to better manage an investment portfolio?

Managing an investment portfolio, whether as an individual investor, as a financial advisor or a portfolio manager on behalf of investors, it is a very complicated and challenging task to perform!

There are many risks of failure to be avoided, underperformance is always a possibility, you need to balance risks of success against the risks of suffering losses. Avoiding big losses is critical, and achieving success is a slow, long-term process which is difficult to achieve.

Some of the keys to success are consistency, long-term thinking, a focus on the details, and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances.

These characteristics of success in managing investments reminds us of another notoriously difficult job: managing a professional football club!

We see many similarities between the way to construct a successful investment portfolio to the way a successful football manager, like Pep Guardiola at Manchester City, manages a successful Premier League winning team.

Pep Guardiola would never start a game with 11 strikers on the pitch, neither would he start a game with 11 defenders. Instead, he will start with some defenders, one goalkeeper (of course), perhaps five midfielders, and one striker. When Pep does this, much like an investment portfolio manager, he is balancing risk and reward, with a successful outcome in mind. For Pep, he wants to avoid losing by conceding no goals (ideally), or at worst only conceding a few goals, while also maximising the probability his team scores many goals and wins the game.

When we construct an investment portfolio, we should be doing the same thing! Retail investors should be thinking the same way too. The line-up of a football team is a helpful guide here.

An equity portfolio has its equivalent of goalkeepers and defenders, we even call them ‘defensive’ investments. These are lower risk, reliable, preferably high-quality investments which like defenders on a football team may not score any goals at all. These investments will not transform your life with incredible, 10x returns, but these investments offer limited downside risk, predictable positive price appreciation, and often predictable income flows in the form of dividends which are dependable. You have high confidence in, and can rely on, your ‘defensive’ investments.

Just like Pep Guardiola, you don’t want your entire team, your entire portfolio, to be made up solely of ‘defensive’ investments either, but you want a solid group of them to defend your investment portfolio, especially during periods of uncertainty and market volatility.

When Pep Guardiola fields his star striker Erling Haaland, he’s doing so with only one thing in mind. Haaland is a striker, he is on the pitch to score goals. He’s not there to defend, to offer protection during the bad times, he is there to win the games for the team.
An investment portfolio needs some strikers, and just like a football team, you don’t want or need too many strikers either. As a manager, you need to get your striker selection right, and if you do, you don’t need many of them on the pitch. Just as with strikers at a top football club, a small number of investments with the potential to deliver very high returns can ‘win you the game’.

If you had bought Amazon stock in 2001, today you would have a 200x return on that investment, that is a +20,000% return. If 2% of your portfolio in 2001 had been invested in Amazon, the rest of your investments could have done nothing over the past 22 years, and you would still have increased your total wealth by c. +400%.

And it’s not only technology companies offering these types of portfolio transforming returns. Monster Beverage, maker of energy drinks, if you had bought its stock in 2005, today you would have made an 84x return, an increase in value of your investment +8,400%.

Even relatively small investment allocations in your portfolio to potential ‘match winners’ who could, if your investment thesis is right, deliver extraordinary returns, can transform your total investment returns for the entire portfolio. Just like a top striker scoring the winning goal.

We even have the equivalent of midfielders in a correctly constructed equity portfolio. These are, just like midfielders on a football team, performing important roles in between defensive and attacking, and some are more ‘defensive’, while others are more ‘attacking’. These investments provide an important balance between our ‘very defensive’ and ‘very attacking’ investments, some could even ‘win the game for us’ by delivering exceptional returns. Maybe not an 84x return like Monster Beverage, but perhaps a +2x or +4x return, this can still make a big difference to a portfolio with an allocation of 5% or 10% to investments like this.

Just like Pep Guardiola, the process of putting all of these positions together to create a ‘team’, as portfolio managers we are building our ‘portfolio’ of names, which can deliver success through a mix of investments performing different roles which together can deliver successful total returns over the long-term. This is the job of the active portfolio manager!

As a final note this week, as a life-long Manchester United supporter it pains me to have to use the manager of Manchester City in this case study for successful management skills.

Hopefully I don’t have to wait too long before I can use a current Manchester United manager as a prime example of management success.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

There’s no such thing as a low energy rich country

Tuesday 17th of April 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Is there a window of opportunity created by climate change?

Climate change is one of the biggest political and economic issues of our age, quite possibly the most important. The global economy’s continued reliance on burning fossil fuels to produce energy emits large volumes of greenhouse gases which are warming the planet’s climate.

Given the risks and uncertainties around the implications of climate change, (as with any political issue where fear is invoked) there are quite extreme views which are gaining traction. One of these is that a solution to climate change is to reduce total energy consumption. In other words, rising demand for energy is bad, because much of this energy is powered by fossil fuels, and as such energy consumption in and of itself is bad. We must, the argument goes, go in the other direction and cut energy consumption.

The environment is important and combatting climate change is important. We agree on that. But human development and wellbeing is also very important too. Billions of people live in poverty or conditions close to poverty and we believe strongly that those people deserve better lives, higher incomes, and higher standards of living. We would hope even the most ardent environmentalist would agree with this sentiment.

Human development is inextricably linked to energy consumption. If we plot each country in the world on a chart, with GDP (income) per capita on the x-axis and electricity consumption per capita on the y-axis, what we see is a very strong correlation between income per capita (a powerful measure of living standards) and electricity consumption. As living standards rise, so too does electricity and energy consumption to facilitate those higher living standards. One is not possible without the other.

This image was created and is owned by Dominion Capital Strategies, 17th April, 2023.

Dominion has produced this chart plotting all of the world’s countries onto it. And there is a glaring gap, a large area of empty space on the bottom right of this chart. The bottom right of the chart represents high income per capita (high living standards) and low energy consumption. There are zero examples of any countries in this area of the chart. In other words, there are no high living standards, low energy use countries. Not one. 100% of countries with high living standards have high energy consumption per capita. 100% of countries with low living standards have low energy consumption per capita.

Let’s use some examples. Ethiopia has GDP per capita of approximately $1,000. Its corresponding electricity consumption per person is 80 kWh. Japan has GDP per capita 40x higher at c. $40,000 per person, while the average Japanese citizen consumes 94x as much energy at c. 7,500 kWh.

Even if we look at middle income countries, the differences are incredible. GDP per capita in Indonesia is approximately $4,000 and its corresponding energy consumption per capita is 1,000 kWh. To get to where China is today (let alone the US or Japan), Indonesia (population 274 million) would see its per capita income rise +400% and its energy use per capita rise +500%.

The majority of humanity, 7 billion people, live in middle and low-income countries. The development of these nations into increasingly wealthy countries with higher living standards means only one thing for energy demand and global energy consumption. It is going to go up a lot!

The idea that we can limit, or even reduce, global energy demand is a fantasy. What’s more, it is not even desirable because it would mean those living in poverty stay living in poverty. We all want the world’s poor to be lifted out of poverty, and that means more energy, not less.

But this doesn’t mean we can just forget the environment either. Climate change is real, humanity’s impact on the climate and natural world is real and getting worse, solutions are needed here.

And here is where the incredible opportunity lies for investors. Rather than burying our heads in the sand and hoping for the best, there are pragmatic solutions that can facilitate the optimal outcome here, one where global energy demand rises substantially to facilitate higher living standards for all, while also becoming much less carbon intensive and thus limiting the effects of climate change.

What’s more, the scale of this opportunity is often mis-understood. After decades of investment in renewables the global economy still only gets 4% of its energy from wind and solar. There is a very long way to go in the build out of renewables. Nuclear power (another source of zero carbon energy) generates another 4%. Again, a lot of upside here from accelerated build outs. Fossil fuels is still 77%!

Huge investment is required in electricity grid infrastructure, electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, nuclear reactors and their associated supply chains, and many other technologies, businesses, and services that will be part of the story of delivering more energy for humanity with lower environmental cost.

Climate change may seem scary to many, but to us as long-term investors, we are genuinely extremely excited about the investment opportunities on offer today in this mega-trend in the global economy.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Long-term investment opportunities in copper

Tuesday 11th of April 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

Skittish markets in the short term...

The current investment environment continues to be challenging, with trailing one-year returns for many asset classes remaining in negative territory. Despite the recent rally in equities, markets remain skittish with many market commentators calling for further volatility and potential downside for asset prices in the coming weeks / months.

We tend to agree that in the short-term we could see further weakness in markets, see our episode from last week for more information on our thinking there.

But as investors, it is the long-term that really matters. Despite the short-term uncertainty and risk of further bouts of market weakness, for the long-term minded investor there are some very attractively valued assets available today.

In some specific areas of the commodities (and related equities) market, we believe, there are interesting dynamics that could offer differentiated returns to a diversified portfolio in 2023 and beyond.

The current demand and supply outlook for some commodities is especially interesting, while the current market valuations offer a degree of a ‘margin of safety’ for investors.

It is rare in any industry to have very much visibility on what demand levels will look like 1-year, 2-years, or more into the future. All industries and markets are inherently difficult to forecast.

We do, however, have a unique starting point today in some sectors of the economy where we can make confident predictions of what demand is likely to look like.

Climate change and the energy transition away from fossil fuels to decarbonise the global economy is a multi-trillion-dollar, multi-decade, global investment opportunity that is already happening now and is set to accelerate. Major governments around the world are committing to major spending subsidisation programs to further accelerate this transition.

What does this mean in reality?

It means upgrading and replacing electricity grids across the planet, it means vast build outs of offshore wind farms and solar projects, it means major build outs of nuclear power plant fleets and the associated infrastructure to connect these new sources of power to the grid, it means hundreds of millions of batteries rolling off of production lines every year to power new fleets of electric vehicles.

What do these aspects of the energy transition have in common? They are all very heavy users of industrial metals, in particular, copper. Copper as a metal is unique in its heat and electricity conductivity, its relative cost, and performance as a material in applications like wiring or EV batteries. The energy transition is going to be very intensive in its use of copper.

Some industry estimates indicate we may need 2-3x the current global copper supply to meet the needs of the global energy transition over the coming 20 years.

When we look at the supply of this critical metal, however, we do not see anything like the expected increase in future supply coming online over the next 10-20 years to meet this major wave of demand.

Why is that?

Copper is a relatively scarce metal in mineable deposits. It has been a useful and widely used material by civilisation for thousands of years. This means the relatively easy to access mineable deposits of copper have largely been exhausted around the world.

Each incremental new mine to produce copper is harder to access, further away from transportation infrastructure, and therefore more costly to bring online.

This creates an interesting set-up for investors willing to invest in the few companies who own high quality mining assets in the copper industry.

We know with a high degree of certainty that demand for this material is going to go up. And it is going to go up a lot!

Meanwhile there are fundamental barriers to bringing on new supplies of copper, as outlined, which restricts the ability of the global industry to raise supply as quickly as demand is rising.

When demand for any good exceeds supply, prices rise. A structural rise in prices of any product or commodity is good news for the existing suppliers of that product. In this case, the structural rise in prices of copper, driven by the coming demand supply imbalance, will be very beneficial for the owners of copper producing assets.

While markets continue to lurch from blind optimism, to deep pessimism, and then back again, obsessed with changes in the short-term, we think it wise to think a little bit longer-term and consider allocations in portfolios with a multi-year, or even as in this investment case for copper, a multi-decade time horizon. It can certainly help investors sleep a little easier!


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

The final act of the bear market cycle

Monday 3rd of April 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

Is this bear market finally over?

In the short-term there continues to be a long list of reasons to be concerned about the health of the economy and financial markets. The war in Ukraine rages on and appears to be escalating further, with little signs of either side in the conflict backing down. Inflation remains stubbornly high and central banks around the world continue to respond with higher interest rates. Those higher rates and the rapidity of the rises have resulted in an unexpected crisis among some less well capitalised / managed banks in the United States and Europe. We’ve even had another round of bail-outs to banks, reminiscent of the 2008 crisis.

This steady drumbeat of economic and confidence headwinds understandably resulted in a major bear market for equities last year. It was also a tough year for bond markets.

We are now well past the 12-month mark on this bear market cycle and so it makes sense to re-assess the stage of the cycle we’re in and how investors should be thinking about being positioned through the remainder of 2023.

The start to 2023 in equity markets has been characterised by relatively low volatility and positive moves up in many equity indexes. S&P 500 and Nasdaq are up so far in 2023 year-to-date. This positive start, however, may simply be yet another short-term rally in an otherwise downward trending bear market. We have been here before where short-term optimism has been mis-interpreted as a sustained new rally in stocks, only for markets to turn negative again.

In interest rate and bond markets, we are seeing a different story. There has been much greater volatility, with some of the sharpest moves in volatility for bond markets seen since 2020. This is an early indication that the calm in equity markets could change soon.

Further, when we look at equity markets, breadth has been coming down. What does this mean? Breadth is a measure of how many stocks in an index or stock market are participating in the broad direction of the market. High breadth means a lot of the stocks in the index are moving up, or down, together. This is a strong signal of the sustainability of that market direction. Low breadth means the opposite, and in the current market we see low breadth in this recent move.

That means most of the move up we have seen in stock indexes like Nasdaq, for example, is being driven by a small number of stocks, while many other stocks have been flat or declined. This historically has been an indicator of market fragility and potential weakness in the short-term.

All-in all, therefore, we are somewhat negative on the very short-term and see the balance of risk to the downside for equities in the short-term.

But, given that this bear market is now more than 12 months old, we expect that the next bout of market volatility and test of lows for markets could be the beginning of the final act of this bear market cycle.

It’s rare for bear market cycles to last much beyond 12-18 months, so even on this basic metric of cycle duration, we should be coming into the final phase of this cycle over the coming 6 months.

The later stages of bear markets in the past have often been interspersed with sharp short-term rallies, much like the recent rallies we have seen in equities. These are then followed by sharp declines and spikes in volatility, often more severe later in cycles.

We think long-term investors should be aware of this likely coming short-term volatility in markets because it will help inform decision making if and when it happens. Our advice is to look through the short-term volatility if it comes, remain focussed on the long-term, and use the opportunity of lower prices to add to risk assets trading on reasonable valuations.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Think more like a gardener

Monday 27th of March 2023

Think long term...

Investors are right to be growing weary of the investment climate today. After the worst global pandemic in a century, global financial markets have been hit by the shocks of inflation, war in Europe, higher interest rates, and now a potential banking crisis in the developed world.

Over the long-term, investing in a diversified portfolio of asset classes like equities and bonds has delivered excellent returns. But it is easy, when looking at historical returns over a long period, say 50 or 100 years, to miss the fact that in the past there were sustained periods of poor asset returns. These periods also often coincided with bouts of inflation, wars, and other major economic shocks.

Parsing out the short-term from the long-term, as a guide to successfully navigating periods like this as investors, is the subject of this week’s episode.

It is easy to fall into the trap of ‘information overload’, even at the best of times, given the amount of news and data available to people at the click of a button or tap on a phone screen. This is magnified in times of real-world stress and turmoil. The feeling of lurching from crisis to crisis can cloud investment making decisions and judgement.

This, at its heart, is a problem of short-term vs. long-term thinking.

As human beings we are biased to overweight short-term information vs. long-term. And this makes sense if you think about it. We evolved in dangerous environments where the immediate danger of wild animals, other humans, and the natural world around us, required us to respond to threats of danger and to do it quickly!

If you think you spotted a large carnivore roaming close to where your family and fellow tribe members are living, it’s very important for your survival, and the survival of the species, that humans respond to that risk.

This instinct remains important, even in the modern world, but it also creates problems for us as investors. Information inputs like, for example, a series of bank failures, or a major war in Eastern Europe, the possibility of an even bigger war in Asia over Taiwan, these can trigger similar emotional responses in our minds of ‘danger’ and ‘fear’. As with our example of spotting the large carnivore near the family encampment in pre-historic times, modern negative news stories can trigger a similar desire to ‘do something’. And this is a strong urge to ‘do something’, it comes from deep within us, we have evolved, for the right reasons, to respond to the thought of imminent danger.

Overcoming this short-term response, and instead focusing on the long-term, is a skill every investor should work on improving. While an emotional response to an imminent threat of physical harm does require an immediate response to avoid danger, such a response to a perceived threat from a geo-political risk five thousand miles away, or a bank failure five thousand miles the other way, does not require an emotional or immediate response in investment portfolios.

As investors, we should think more like a gardener. Anyone involved in that pursuit knows, intuitively, that the long-term is your friend. You take actions in the short-term to plant and maintain the garden, but this is all done with a long-term goal in mind, allowing the plants to grow and mature over time into something much greater than the cost of time and money the gardener puts into it in the first place.

Just like the gardener, as investors we must navigate the equivalent of winters, bad weather, and unexpected problems, but we must never lose sight of the long-term goal, and we must never interrupt the process of growth we triggered with our initial investments. The last thing a gardener should do in response to unexpected bad weather, is to rip up all of the plants by the root and start again!

As investors, we must remain long-term minded. The negative sentiment and uncertainty will pass, eventually, and in the meantime, we should be tending to our portfolios in a prudent way. What does that mean in practice?

It means going slow and steady through bouts of market volatility, taking time to think about the businesses and asset classes we want to own over the long-term and which will likely grow over a 5-year or 10-year period, invest in the appropriate strategies, and then allow the long-term to do the rest for you!


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...

Failing banks...

Tuesday 21st of March 2023

Listen to this financial market update by playing this audio...

Audio in Spanish
Audio in English

What’s going on…. and what should investors do?

In last week’s episode titled ‘Are We There Yet?’, we discussed the issue of interest rate rises and specifically, whether interest rates have risen enough to slow the economy down and bring inflation under control.

We ended the episode by giving examples of the signals investors might expect to see which would indicate financial conditions are close to that point of sufficient tightening, the main example being high profile companies unexpectedly getting into major trouble.

Although we were predicting this would happen at some point in 2023, we did not expect this to happen so quickly!

The past week has seen high profile banks in the United States and Europe, most notably SVB and Credit Suisse, come under major selling pressure and require central bank bail-outs. Many other banks have seen considerable declines in share prices as questions have been raised about the strength of their balance sheets too.

What has surprised markets is how quickly this has all happened. The dramatic events impacting the banking sector of the past week are, we would argue, a classic example of what we were talking about last week. Unexpected and high-profile business failures are a major signal that financial conditions have tightened substantially.

Let’s dig a little into the current crisis in the banking industry and explain what we think is going on.

The ultra-low interest rates of the past decade and major stimulus measures of the COVID pandemic led to a big increase in cash deposits at banks in the United States and Europe. Smaller banks like SVB in the US, with less sophisticated risk management structures and less stringent regulatory oversight, were using some of these deposits to earn income by lending out money. This is how banking works, at a very basic level. You take in deposits and pay interest out to depositors, then you lend those deposits out at a higher interest rate, and keep the difference.

The very sudden increase in interest rates in the US over the past 12 months, as part of the Federal Reserve’s fight against inflation, created a major problem for banks like SVB. The interest they were paying out to depositors had to keep rising to compete with rising rates available on deposits at other banks, meanwhile the interest they were earning on the money they had leant out was not going up as quickly, significantly reducing the profitability of the bank. As more depositors started to move their cash away from SVB to find higher rates elsewhere, rumours about the viability of the bank started to go mainstream, encouraging more SVB depositors to withdraw their cash deposits. This was an old-fashioned bank run!

The Federal Reserve last week intervened and created a new facility where it effectively is promising to underwrite all cash deposits (of any size) at every US bank. This is a major intervention and appears to have calmed some of concerns that were being raised about other banks who may have similar balance sheet exposures as SVB.

This story is far from over and we may see more unexpected revelations from banks in the coming weeks and months.

The next question is, what should investors do about this risk?

We do not think, and this is really important, that we are likely to see a banking crisis like in 2008. That was a credit driven event which put the stability of the entire global financial system on the line. Major banks today in Europe and North America are much better capitalised now than was the case back in 2007-2008. Even in the case of SVB, its assets on balance sheet were still large enough to have paid back 90-95% of all depositors cash, if the US central bank had not stepped in. The bank was in trouble, but nothing like the trouble banks were in 2008.

Investors should be careful not to panic and think we’re going to see a re-run of the last crisis. That is unlikely.

We see the recent selling in equity markets as an opportunity to incrementally add to high quality long-term investment names trading on reasonable valuations.

Most importantly, though, and again to return to our theme from last week’s episode, it is precisely these unexpected blow ups that signal to us as patient investors that we are likely entering the final phase of this bear market cycle. That could mean short-term volatility and some further price weakness, but it also means the eventual market lows could be here soon, which is an optimal time to aggressively buy risk assets. Not yet, but it’s coming.


We would like to thank Dominion Capital Strategies for writing this content and sharing it with us.

Sources: Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Marketwatch, MSCI.

Copyright © 2023 Dominion Capital Strategies, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.


Have you watched our financial news reports?

You can see the videos of our weekly financial news report on our social media:

To start taking professional financial advice and to learn more about investment opportunities...